Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 30.06.2025 02:36

Thank you.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Mariners' vibes turn ugly after sweep: 'Nobody feels sorry for us' - The Seattle Times
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Just in the last 5 years:
NBA Draft will have tons of international talent, which is to be expected - NBA
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Boulder County resident exposed Flatiron Flyer passengers to measles - The Denver Post
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
What’s next?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Why do you think it is bad to allow people to self-identify as a different gender?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
What’s the worst thing you caught anyone in your family doing?